The field of deep learning has witnessed a remarkable shift towards extremely compute- and memory-intensive neural networks. These newer larger models have enabled researchers to advance state-of-the-art tools across a variety of fields. This phenomenon has spurred the development of algorithms for distributed training of neural networks over a larger number of hardware accelerators. In this paper, we discuss and compare current state-of-the-art frameworks for large scale distributed deep learning. First, we survey current practices in distributed learning and identify the different types of parallelism used. Then, we present empirical results comparing their performance on large image and language training tasks. Additionally, we address their statistical efficiency and memory consumption behavior. Based on our results, we discuss algorithmic and implementation portions of each framework which hinder performance.

Performance of a parallel code running on a large supercomputer can vary significantly from one run to another even when the executable and its input parameters are left unchanged. Such variability can occur due to perturbation of the computation and/or communication in the code. In this paper, we investigate the case of performance variability arising due to network effects on supercomputers that use a dragonfly topology – specifically, Cray XC systems equipped with the Aries interconnect. We perform post-mortem analysis of network hardware counters, profiling output, job queue logs, and placement information, all gathered from periodic representative application runs. We investigate the causes of performance variability using deviation prediction and recursive feature elimination. Additionally, using time-stepped performance data of individual applications, we train machine learning models that can forecast the execution time of future time steps.

Call graphs generated by profiling tools are critical to dissecting the performance of parallel programs. Although many mature and sophisticated profiling tools record call graph data, each tool is different in its runtime overheads, memory consumption, and output data generated. In this work, we perform a comparative evaluation study on the call graph data generation capabilities of several popular profiling tools – Caliper, HPCToolkit, TAU, and Score-P. We evaluate their runtime overheads, memory consumption, and generated call graph data (size and quality). We perform this comparison empirically by running several proxy applications, AMG, LULESH, and Quicksilver on a parallel cluster. Our results show which tool results in the lowest overheads and produces more meaningful call graph data under different conditions.

Resource contention on high performance computing (HPC) platforms can lead to significant variation in application performance. When several jobs experience such large variations in run times, it can lead to less efficient use of system resources. It can also lead to users over-estimating their job’s expected run time, which degrades the efficiency of the system scheduler. Mitigating performance variation on HPC platforms benefits end users and also enables more efficient use of system resources. In this paper, we present a pipeline for collecting and analyzing system and application performance data for jobs submitted over long periods of time. We use a set of machine learning (ML) models trained on this data to classify performance variation using current system counters. Additionally, we present a new resource-aware job scheduling algorithm that utilizes the ML pipeline and current system state to mitigate job variation. We evaluate our pipeline, ML models, and scheduler using various proxy applications and an actual implementation of the scheduler on an Infiniband-based fat-tree cluster.

In the last few years, the memory requirements to train state-of-the-art neural networks have far exceeded the DRAM capacities of modern hardware accelerators. This has necessitated the development of efficient algorithms to train these neural networks in parallel on large-scale GPU-based clusters. Since computation is relatively inexpensive on modern GPUs, designing and implementing extremely efficient communication in these parallel training algorithms is critical for extracting the maximum performance. This paper presents AxoNN, a parallel deep learning framework that exploits asynchrony and message-driven execution to schedule neural network operations on each GPU, thereby reducing GPU idle time and maximizing hardware efficiency. By using the CPU memory as a scratch space for offloading data periodically during training, AxoNN is able to reduce GPU memory consumption by four times. This allows us to increase the number of parameters per GPU by four times, thus reducing the amount of communication and increasing performance by over 13%. When tested against large transformer models with 12-100 billion parameters on 48-384 NVIDIA Tesla V100 GPUs, AxoNN achieves a per-GPU throughput of 49.4-54.78% of theoretical peak and reduces the training time by 22-37 days (15-25% speedup) as compared to the state-of-the-art.

Performance analysis is critical for pinpointing bottlenecks in applications. Many different profilers exist to instrument parallel programs on HPC systems, however, there is a lack of tools for analyzing such data programmatically. Hatchet, an open-source Python library, can read profiling data from several tools, and enables the user to perform a variety of analyses on hierarchical performance data. In this paper, we augment Hatchet to support new features: a call path query language for representing call path-related queries, visualizations for displaying and interacting with the structured data, and new operations for performing analysis on multiple datasets. Additionally, we present performance optimizations in Hatchet’s HPCToolkit reader and the unify operation to enable scalable analysis of large profiles.

The Message Passing Interface (MPI) defines the semantics of data communication operations, while the imple- menting libraries provide several parameterized algorithms for each operation. Each algorithm of an MPI collective operation may work best on a particular system and may be dependent on the specific communication problem. Internally, MPI libraries employ heuristics to select the best algorithm for a given com- munication problem when being called by an MPI application. The majority of MPI libraries allow users to override the default algorithm selection, enabling the tuning of this selection process. The problem then becomes how to select the best possible algorithm for a specific case automatically. In this paper, we address the algorithm selection problem for MPI collective communication operations. To solve this problem, we propose an auto-tuning framework for collective MPI operations based on machine-learning techniques. First, we execute a set of benchmarks of an MPI library and its entire set of collective algorithms. Second, for each algorithm, we fit a performance model by applying regression learners. Last, we use the regression models to predict the best possible (fastest) algorithm for an unseen communication problem. We evaluate our approach for different MPI libraries and several parallel machines. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms the standard algorithm selection heuristics, which are hard-coded into the MPI libraries, by a significant margin.

With the growing number of GPU-based supercomputing platforms and GPU-enabled applications, the ability to accurately model the performance of such applications is becoming increasingly impor- tant. Most current performance models for GPU-enabled appli- cations are limited to single node performance. In this work, we propose a methodology for end-to-end performance modeling of distributed GPU applications. Our work strives to create perfor- mance models that are both accurate and easily applicable to any distributed GPU application. We combine trace-driven simulation of MPI communication using the TraceR-CODES framework with a profiling-based roofline model for GPU kernels. We make substan- tial modifications to these models to capture the complex effects of both on-node and off-node networks in today’s multi-GPU su- percomputers. We validate our model against empirical data from GPU platforms and also vary tunable parameters of our model to observe how they might affect application performance.

Performance of a parallel code running on a large supercomputer can vary significantly from one run to another even when the executable and its input parameters are left unchanged. Such variability can occur due to perturbation of the computation and/or communication in the code. In this paper, we investigate the case of performance variability arising due to network effects on supercomputers that use a dragonfly topology – specifically, Cray XC systems equipped with the Aries interconnect. We perform post-mortem analysis of network hardware counters, profiling output, job queue logs, and placement information, all gathered from periodic representative application runs. We investigate the causes of performance variability using deviation prediction and recursive feature elimination. Additionally, using time-stepped performance data of individual applications, we train machine learning models that can forecast the execution time of future time steps.

High performance computing applications, runtimes, and platforms are becoming more configurable to enable ap- plications to obtain better performance. As a result, users are increasingly presented with a multitude of options to configure application-specific as well as platform-level parameters. The combined effect of different parameter choices on application performance is difficult to predict, and an exhaustive evaluation of this combinatorial parameter space is practically infeasible. One approach to parameter selection is a user-guided exploration of a part of the space. However, such an ad hoc exploration of the parameter space can result in suboptimal choices. Therefore, an automatic approach that can efficiently explore the parameter space is needed. In this paper, we propose HiPerBOt, a Bayesian optimization based configuration selection framework to identify application and platform-level parameters that result in high performing configurations. We demonstrate the effectiveness of HiPerBOt in tuning parameters that include compiler flags, runtime settings, and application-level options for several parallel codes, including, Kripke, Hypre, LULESH, and OpenAtom.

Interconnection networks grow larger as supercomputers include more nodes and require higher bandwidth for performance. This scaling significantly increases the fraction of power consumed by the network, by increasing the number of network components (links and switches). Typically, network links consume power continuously once they are turned on. However, recent proposals for energy efficient interconnects have introduced low-power operation modes for periods when network links are idle. Low-power operation can increase messaging time when switching a link from low-power to active operation. We extend the TraceR-CODES network simulator for power modeling to evaluate the impact of energy efficient networking on power and performance. Our evaluation presents the first study on both single-job and multi-job execution to realistically simulate power consumption and performance under congestion for a large-scale HPC network. Results on several workloads consisting of HPC proxy applications show that single-job and multi-job execution favor different modes of low power operation to have significant power savings at the cost of minimal performance degradation.

Performance analysis is critical for eliminating scalability bottlenecks in parallel codes. There are many profiling tools that can instrument codes and gather performance data. However, analytics and visualization tools that are general, easy to use, and programmable are limited. In this paper, we focus on the analytics of structured profiling data, such as that obtained from calling context trees or nested region timers in code. We present a set of techniques and operations that build on the pandas data analysis library to enable analysis of parallel profiles. We have implemented these techniques in a Python-based library called Hatchet that allows structured data to be filtered, aggregated, and pruned. Using performance datasets obtained from profiling parallel codes, we demonstrate performing common performance analysis tasks reproducibly with a few lines of Hatchet code. Hatchet brings the power of modern data science tools to bear on performance analysis.